**Email from Keris7lok reader upon watching the video and the previous article [Click Here].
I must say that we are being polite. Because, it is a matter of FACT that Rafizi knew he was losing the debate. Read on to understand the drama.
Firstly, it is evident that when Rafizi comes across an opponent that he can't outsmart in a debate, he will invite the opponent to join PR. Mind you, this is not the first time that Rafizi invited a BN speaker to join PR. This happened in a UKEC program on July 30th, 2011. Rafizi invited Dato’ Sri @idris_jala to join PR during a forum in KL which touched mostly on economics. In the same panel was Dato' @tilianker from MCA and YB @tonypua from DAP. Rafizi's invitation immediately made headlines in the local news portals.
This 'Indecent Proposal' proves 3 things ( Demi Moore fans, please focus ) :-
1) That PR does not have enough strategists to manage the country. How can you have a PR strategist whom by his own admission, meets fortnightly to discuss public policies, be drained of ideas on how to draft a nation's policies, that he needs to make a plea to BN speakers in an open forum? Mind you, drafting a nation's policy is different from a company policy that Rafizi claims to have some experience in. Doesn't this prove that the young leaders of PR, who PR self-proclaims to be smart & energetic, are actually not so smart & also desperate?
2) The reason that Rafizi couldn't answer KJ's question (refer to minute xx of the debate) on who is on PR's shadow cabinet not only lies on the fact that DAP, PAS & PKR, the parties within PR cannot decide on which post to be given to each party, but PR lacks of credible & intelligent leaders who can actually hold the portfolio. Let's take a moment to think of all the key ministerial posts and try to match it with the kind of personnel that PR has. Can you think of enough names to fill in all the posts?
3) Rafizi, PKR Director of Strategies & Chief Executive of Selangor Economic Advisory Office was outwitted in two short debates; one on Economics and the other on public policies…my following questions – Isn’t he is supposed to be the best that PR has? Do we want to trust such a person to draft our policies?
Secondly, in his closing argument, instead of deliberating further on the topic, Rafizi chose to thank the organisers for the event. Upon watching the video, I was basically saying "excuse me, with all the time & effort taken to organise this short debate, Rafizi wants to waste the last 5 minutes given for rounding up by saying tq? Has he forgotten about all the publicity that has been put into having a policy debate by politicians? Both speakers flew hours & hours all the way from KL to spend that last few minutes saying thank you. Great!". Those who like watching debates, will always look forward to hear the closing arguments & that was such a disappointment. Soon after, I come to realise that every point that was raised by Rafizi was rebutted by Khairy. Thus, it is better for Rafizi to abstain from raising too many issues as having counter arguments will not be favorable for him. Smart? NOT for those who can see what he is doing. So, for those of you with an open-mind, listen carefully to the whole debate [Click Here] to put into context what I’ve said, and don’t forget to be enlightened to see the drama that was taking place.
K7L : Tsk! Tsk! Razifi, you can't maneuver yourself out of this one without people noticing.
0 ulasan:
Post a Comment